Letter Bill Kaysing The Answer To Scott Part 2/2

bk intro — Letter to Bill Kaysing Part 2-2

The Answer of Bill Kaysing Part 2-2

In the first article [1], the handwritten correspondence from Scott to Bill Kaysing is presented, concluding with a question. It is crucial to note that Scott had sent multiple letters to Bill; however, our current focus will be on Bill Kaysing's response to the inquiry posed by Scott in this particular letter. The question raised was whether the Apollo lunar missions could have served as a cover for military operations, and if so, he requested further elaboration, highlighting that certain aspects of the Apollo program remain classified to this day.

Due to privacy concerns, I must redact all surnames mentioned in the letter to prevent any potential harassment from overly zealous moon landing proponents.

Here is the original letter Bill Kaysing sent in reply to Scott.

Source: Bill Kaysing tribute website

DEAR SCOTT YOUR RESEARCH EFFORTS AND RESULTS ARE TERRIFIC. THE BEST I HAVE EVER SEEN. YOU SHOULD TAKE UP SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AS A VOCATION.

TO ANSWER YOUR QUERY RE THE REAL PURPOSE OF APOLLO. IN 1956 IT WAS LEARNED THAT AN H BOMB WOULD FIT INTO THE NOSECONE OF AN ATLAS ICBM. SO WORK BEGAN ON BUILDING HARDENED ATLAS LAUNCH SITES UNDERGROUND WITH FARMS ON TOP TO DISGUISE THEM

SINCE I WAS CLEARED AND WORKED ON ATLAS I SAW THE MAPS OF WHERE THESE SITES WERE LOCATED. BUT ONE PROBLEM, ATLAS MISSILES BLEW UP AND THE DANGER TO LAUNCH CREWS UNDERGROUND WAS GREAT. 14 ATLAS D SERIES BLEW UP AT VANDENBERG.

SO WHILE WORKING WITH ROCKETDYNE’S ADVANCED DESIGN GROUP I LEARNED THAT NASA AND THE MILITARY REALLY WANTED TO PUT ATLAS MISSILES ON THE SURFACE OF THE MOON AIMED AT RUSSIA.

SO APOLLO WAS REALLY A MILITARY PROJECT AND NOT A PEACEFUL SCIENCE-ORIENTED MISSION. NOTE THAT ALL BUT ONE OF THE ASTRONOTS WAS MILITARY.

BUT ADVANCED DESIGN SCIENTISTS WHO I TALKED WITH SAID THAT GOING TO THE MOON IN THE SIXTIES WOULD HAVE A NEGLIGIBLE CHANCE OF SUCCESS….SOMETHING LIKE .0017.

THE AUTHOR OF “ROCKET PROPULSION ELEMENTS” MAY STILL BE ALIVE AND HE WOULD AMPLIFY THIS DISCUSSION.

I JUST FELT LIKE A TIME TRAVELER WHEN I WENT THRU THE FILES OF THIS GIANT UCSB LIBRARY WHERE I STUDY AND FOUND HIS BOOK. DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED. I THINK GEO IS DEAD BECAUSE I AM 82 AND HE WAS QUITE A BIT OLDER. MAYBE YOU CAN FIND HIM. THE LIBRARIAN HERE COULD NOT. WHAT YOU HAVE DONE FOR ME IS TO OPEN UP A NEW AVENUE OF DISCOVERY BY, AS SHAKESPEARE WOULD SAY, CALLING UP SPIRITS FROM THE MISTY DEEPS. I KNEW TWO SCIENTISTS QUITE WELL AND WILL TRY TO FIND THEM FOR YOU...R.J. redacted PHD AND STANLEY redacted, BOTH OF ROCKETDYNE RESEARCH.

SO THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR VALUABLE HELP. JOY ACTION SIGNED

Bill kaysing 9/26/04

NASA

On the 4th of October 1957 the Soviets brought the first satellite, Sputnik I, into Earth orbit. The USA was embarrassed by this defeat. In those days the three main military branches, the Navy, Army and Air Force each ran their own rocket programs. They were more in competition with one another then they cooperated. President Dwight Eisenhower believed that a “civilian” agency would be more effective and by the 29th of July 1958 the NASA was created. Eisenhower made them primarily responsibility for America's space program. However, Eisenhower ordered the NASA to forget about a moon landing.

On 24 July 1969, just three days after the Apollo 11 moon landing. This critical article appeared in the Dutch Newspaper "De Tijd". Experts Crush Johnson Criticizing moon race with Russians. The battle for the moon STRANGELY ENOUGH, NASA who was ordered by President Eisenhower to forget all about a moon landing, was able to produce fully detailed plans that not only showed that a moon landing was possible, but also that such a landing was the only space project that would offer the opportunity to gain an advantage over the Russians.[2]

It is more likely that the NASA was created to deflect from the failures of the three military branches. By calling the NASA a civilian agency it made room for dark military projects while the NASA would run a space program for the public, a program where fiction and science were mixed into some obscure projects.

Rocketdyne

From February 1957 until June 1963 Bill Kaysing worked for Rocketdyne, a major aerospace contractor and a division of North American Aviation (NAA) located in Santa Susanna, California. The company was founded in 1955 and became Rockwell International in 1967. In 1996 it was bought by Boeing and in 2005 the Rocketdyne Division was sold to United Technologies Corporation, becoming Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne as part of Pratt & Whitney. In 2013 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne was sold to GenCorp, which merged it with Aerojet to form Aerojet Rocketdyne [4]

Bill Kaysing worked in various capacities having to do with technical publications. When he was the Head Of the Research department at Santa Susanna research facility laboratory he had a Gray batch with Top Q clearance, which meant that he could go anywhere and talk to anyone on the base. [3]

Bill Kaysing’s time at Rocketdyne covers the early US manned space flights: Mercury 1958–1963, Gemini 1961–1966 and Apollo 1961–1972. The project Bill mainly worked on was the Atlas rockets.[3]

Project Horizon

Declassified documents show that a permanent outpost on the moon was required for national security. In 1959 the Army was working on Project Horizon, a lunar outpost to protect potential United States’ interests on the moon. The projected operational date with twelve soldiers was for December 1966. [5]

Project Lunex

In 1957 the US Air Force was also working on a project that would establish a moon base. This was for a 21-person underground Air Force base on the Moon by 1968. This declassified report also mentions the Atlas rocket, something Bill Kaysing was working on during his time at Rocketdyne, and that he also mentions it in his answer to Scott. [6]

Outer Space Treaty

On the 17th of October 1963 the U.N. General Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution prohibiting the introduction of weapons of mass destruction in outer space. This led to further negotiations and on the 10th of October 1967 the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union signed the Outer Space Treaty. Today the treaty is signed by 115 countries including all leading space nations. [7]

Summary

Bill told Scott that during his time at Rocketdyne he had learnt that the NASA and the military wanted to build a base on the moon with Atlas missiles aimed at Russia. Project Horizon and Project Lunex are clear examples of plans to build a military base on the moon.

Bill is also clear about the NASA and its military connections. He points out correctly that all Apollo astronauts, except one, were military. This connection becomes blatantly clear when you read the declassified Project Lunex report. The report mentions the NASA and that they work together with the US Air Force. Bill was right!

“High resolution photographs of the entire lunar surface may provide this information. Present NASA plans if expedited could provide the information for this LUNEX program.”[6]

“The NASA proposed Lunar Orbiter program is a possible source of the required data.”[6]

“The Air Force and NASA are presently trying to determine the lunar composition indirectly through study”[6]

“Initial training for aerospace crew personnel will require the use of existing space training facilities. Joint-use agreements between NASA and other USA.F agencies”[6]

Thank you Bill

Bill Kaysing wrote this letter in august 2004, half a year before he passed away. His pen was as sharp as always and his mind a beacon of light for those who have the ears to listen and the eyes to see.